FIFTH WALL PE
Fifth Wall PE · Phygital Elements · Vol. 01

Same asset. Two revenue logics.

A single Atmosphere location's REIT rent set against its PEIT operating income — with every cost of delivery shown on the page, not buried. Two public precedent deals anchor the two halves of the thesis. The number that survives scrutiny is not the gross multiple; it is the one left after the bill.

Illustrative · rounded assumptions · full model to follow
01

Two precedents, both public.

Each deal proves a different leg of the model in the open market — one for the asset, one for the operating layer.

01

Lakewood Center

PRCP · Lyon Living · Silverpeak — Aug 2025
2M
sqft · ~150 acres
22M+
visitors / yr
$1B+
sales / yr

A fading regional mall being transformed into a walkable, mixed-use place to live — by three disciplines at once: retail operations, residential development, and investment capital.

Where it meets Fifth Wall PE
  • Same raw material: a "zombie" mall converted to new revenue — institutional capital is already chasing the asset type you transform.
  • Same goal: single-use retail becomes a multi-layered third place — the Atmosphere™ concept.
  • Same capital stack: operator / in-kind developer / cash capital maps to ALA / PEIT / the 20% capital slice.
  • The 2.0 difference: they use concrete and static leases; you use code, presence, and no ten-year lease.
02

CBRE → Industrious

Asset-light operating layer & valuation — Jan 2025
~$800M
implied EV
~$4M
per unit
50%+
revenue CAGR

CBRE acquired an experience operator that owns no buildings — running revenue-share partnerships with property owners — and built a new segment around it, "Building Operations & Experience."

Where it meets Fifth Wall PE
  • Asset-light operation: running space via revenue-share without owning it — the ALA / PEIT logic.
  • Product is presence: selling the operating layer, not the walls.
  • Valuation proof: ~$800M EV · ~$4M/unit · 50%+ CAGR — PEIT's direct anchor.
  • Exit path: staged stake → full acquisition → new platform segment.
02

One location. Rent versus operating income.

A 200,000 sqft asset. REIT 1.0 leases it once, statically. PEIT operates it and stacks several revenue layers — then pays the cost of running each one. Both sides are shown.

PEIT revenue layer
$/sqft
Annual
Modular space + turnoverOpen Market · Market Hall — daily to yearly, not a 10-year lease
~$22
~$4.4M
Back-of-house servicesLighting, comms, connectivity, logistics — the CAM a mall tenant already pays outside rent, here as revenue
~$9
~$1.8M
Media / DOOHPingPod™ · Fifth Signal™ — addressable, attributable, near-zero marginal cost
~$7
~$1.4M
Live commerce + The StageCommission on live-selling, event and broadcast revenue
~$13
~$2.6M
MembershipMaster + Enterprise Arcade — built from traffic below, not from $/sqft
~$15.3M
PEIT gross revenue
~$128
~$25.5M
The old page stopped here, at 3.3× gross. That is the number an underwriter breaks in thirty seconds — because gross revenue is not what a building is valued on.

So the cost of delivering each layer is on the page. This is where Atmosphere separates from both a hotel and a traditional mall: the building itself runs light — power, HVAC, connectivity and a lean 10–15 person team, about $0.50/sqft per month — but every revenue layer still carries its own cost of goods. Membership promises free coffee, water and wifi. The Stage needs production crew. The Arcade is a serviced workspace, and workspace is expensive to run.

Cost of delivery
rate
Annual
Modular space + turnoverleasing ops, turnover cleaning, fit-out churn
~30%
−$1.3M
Back-of-house servicesthe actual power, comms and staff behind the services
~45%
−$0.8M
Media / DOOHcontent ops, ad-sales commission, screen amortization
~35%
−$0.5M
Live commerce + Stageevent production, hosts, staging, streaming crew
~55%
−$1.4M
Membershipfree-house coffee/water/wifi (Master) + serviced workspace (Arcade, ~75% cost)
~59%
−$9.0M
Building opexpower, HVAC, internet, 10–15 staff — $0.50/sqft/mo
−$1.2M
PEIT NOI
44% margin
~$11.2M
$3.0M
REIT 1.0 net rent, one location — essentially NOI under a triple-net lease
$11.2M
PEIT NOI after every cost of delivery — a 44% operating margin
≈3.7×
NOI uplift — the multiple that survives the question "where is the cost?"
3.7× on NOI, with the bill shown, is worth more than 3.3× on gross with the bill hidden. One is financeable. The other is a slide an investor deletes.
03

Where the membership number comes from.

Not a $/sqft guess. Built from traffic, converted conservatively, and discounted for churn — the way a subscription business is actually underwritten.

Annual visits
1.5M
A conservative floor for a 200k sqft third place — well under Lakewood's 22M, because only reachable, convertible traffic is counted.
Unique members
30,000
Members drive the majority of repeat visits. Counting unique paying members, not visits, avoids the double-count that inflates most models.
Master @ $20/mo
$6.1M
Flat monthly access — unlimited entry, free-house coffee, water and wifi. Priced like an unlimited car wash: low, recurring, sticky. 85% retention applied.
Arcade @ $75/mo
$9.2M
40% of Master members upgrade to the Enterprise Arcade — a serviced workspace at roughly half the Industrious price. Higher revenue, but also the highest cost line above.
The memo says the member is the asset. The model now says the same thing: membership is the single largest revenue line — and after cost, the Master tier is the highest-margin dollar in the building.
04

The same logic at portfolio scale.

Single-location economics held constant, shown at one and fifty locations. NOI, not gross — the figure the enterprise value is actually built on.

ScaleREIT 1.0 NOI/yrPEIT gross/yrPEIT NOI/yrNOI uplift
1 location~$3.0M~$25.5M~$11.2M~3.7×
50 locations~$150M~$1.3B~$560M~3.7×

Not all locations open in Year 1; rollout pace and ramp-up are modeled year by year in the full model. Fifty locations is ~10M sqft — an ambitious but defensible decade target. A 500-location figure is deliberately not shown here: at ~100M sqft it would rank among the three largest retail owners in the country, and belongs in a long-range scenario, not a unit-economics page.

05

Case 2 ties revenue to a value and a ramp.

The two anchors from the CBRE / Industrious deal link the portfolio model's enterprise value and its Year 1→5 growth to a real precedent.

Anchor A · Value per unit
~$4M

~$800M EV ÷ ~200 units. As a conservative floor: 50 locations → ~$200M enterprise value. Industrious units are far smaller than a 200,000 sqft Atmosphere, so a real location sits above this floor rather than at it.

Source → Case 2 (CBRE / Industrious)
Anchor B · Growth rate
50%+

The asset-light operator's compound revenue growth since 2021, confirmed by CBRE at close. It sets the upper reference for the ramp curve — how fifty locations fill from Year 1 to Year 5.

Source → Case 2 (Industrious)
The same asset that yields ~$3M in rent under REIT 1.0 produces ~$11M in NOI operated as a PEIT — ~3.7×, after cost. At fifty locations that is ~$560M in annual NOI, anchored to a value per unit and a growth rate the market has already paid for.

Important — read this part carefully

All $/sqft values, percentages, multiples and dollar figures on this page are rounded assumptions chosen for illustration only — not a valuation. The single largest sensitivities are the membership conversion rate, the visit-to-member ratio, and the cost-of-delivery percentages on each layer; optimistic, base and pessimistic sets, with real $/sqft inputs, will be established in the full model. The 44% operating margin is a modeled assumption, not a result.

Lakewood Center (Pacific Retail Capital Partners / Lyon Living / Silverpeak) and CBRE / Industrious are public precedent deals, independent of Fifth Wall PE, cited as reference and analogy only. Role mappings are an analytical framework, not a claim of affiliation. Nothing here is an offer of securities or investment, legal or tax advice.